Do you got evidence for their experience being more significant?

That statistic is an average. There are many other unrecorded crashes that could have taken place.

If they change the age to 18, those kids wont have as much experience to because the driving classes wouldn't start till there about 17.

Ya adults are as capable to making bad decisions on the road as much as teenagers are.

This only applies for one school as you state. So I sure that the law wont change a rule because of an issue of one school!

What I am trying to say is there are many more causes to teenage accidents, like slippery roads during the winter. Or even as simple as their gender. It all depends on the environment the accidents are taking place in.

Like the article states, Not all teenagers are as stupid as you think. So this strongly makes me disagree with you agruement!

I believe driving age should not be changed for many reasons. One reason is Many young adults are responsible enough for the opportunity to drive at age 16. It states in Driving age should not be raised By: A.J Rox, “Teenagers can be more responsible drivers than some adults. Men are 77% more likely to get into accidents than women. If people really want to change driving age, then how about saving lives by allowing only women to drive?" This quote is huge because many people are stereotypical when they say TEENAGERS. Like the article quoted, there is a different cause to why there are so many teenage crashes, not because of age.

The wouldn't be able to go pay of college loans if they have to pay for someones medical bill, and fix their own car.

Yes but when you turn 18 you can leave the house and you have control of the people who enter. One of your friends could sneak alcohol, and you could get drunk. Now, if you go driving somewhere, that is where your accident can happen. From being intoxicated while driving, and you could potentially hit someone.

I totally agree with you, when you say "Raising the driving age will just create inexperienced, accident-prone drivers at 18 instead of 16.”

18 year olds are capable of stupid behaviors too!!! (Nice Spelling also)

Yes, I agree it would reduce 16 year old driving, but 18 year olds are just as risky when it comes to bad behavior on the road, so it would increase the amount of accidents for 18 year olds because of inexperience. The same reason many want to change the age but it wouldn't be effective.

I disagree with this because statistics are shown that changing the age of driving will not reduce the amount of deaths because the risk of bad behavior is just as bad as a 20 year old driving.

Driving age should not be changed because it doesn't solve anything! In the article "Should driving age be raised to 18?" It states that “16-17 year old males show just as much risky behavior affects to males in their early 20’s.” Basically what this is saying is that even if they were to raise the driving, the risk of bad behavior would be just as significant. To go along with that, in the article "Driving age should not be raised By A.J Rox" it quotes “If the driving age is raised then 18 year olds will also crash because of inexperience.” Why should we change the driving age when there will not be a reasonable solution?