Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 71% |
Arguments: | 7 |
Debates: | 0 |
Teenagers are teenagers, no matter how old they are. They're brains are already developed so it doesn't make a difference.
These are all of my sources
It’s inexperience! You’ve fully developed at age 16 so there isn’t any more growing, you’re just delaying death if you switch it to 18 and have bad drivers. The most dangerous drivers on the road are people with under 2 years of experience.
Raising the driving age makes kids more dependent on parents. No parents want to chauffeur their kids around ANOTHER two years. Plus, most teens don’t have access to public transit.
It isn't a weapon if you use it right. Raising the driving age would only delay death anyway
It doesn’t matter, driving is deadly for all age groups at times. Auto accidents is the leading cause of death for ALL age groups. Teenagers don’t have as many diseases and sicknesses as old people do, so that sets the numbers back for cause of death and puts car accidents at first. Which makes it seem that driving is worse than it really is.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |