Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 0 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 72% |
Arguments: | 3 |
Debates: | 0 |
MY CLAIM: Mascots shouldn't be banned because they show honor & tradition
REASON # 1 Tribes who represent mascots are honored to be.
EVIDENCE Marquette University’s Native American community, stated that “They've always seen the Chief as a positive symbol”
EVIDENCE David Hinkle, graduated from Coachella Valley High School, He said that “I don’t think it can be viewed as offensive,” He also added “He is proud to be one of the Arabs” (His schools Mascot)
REASON # 2 Mascots can promote historical background
EVIDENCE When people see the logo or mascot it can show them how certain cultures dressed or still do, leading people to respect that type of culture even more.
EVIDENCE With a certain mascot that has a historical background behind it, people are almost forced or want to learn why that mascot is historical, giving good background knowledge of that culture to people.
EVIDENCE They provide historical background when schools sometimes reenact why their mascot is their mascot, showing why their mascot is so honorable.
I think that mascots should stay because they show honor to the tribes/ethnicities that the mascots represent, therefore mascots aren't here to to "insult" races, they are here to show that, the mascot is respected and honored otherwise, it wouldn't be a mascot.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |